Scanverra vs. WebPageTest
Scanverra is a Lighthouse-based website audit covering performance, SEO, accessibility, and security. WebPageTest (now operated by Catchpoint) is a deep, multi-location performance testing and monitoring tool, free for basic use with paid tiers for API access and RUM.
| Feature | Scanverra | WebPageTest |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest paid price WebPageTest's Professional tier (now under Catchpoint), per catchpoint.com/pricing | $19/mo ($228/yr, Pro) | $180/yr (Professional) |
| Free tier & limits | Unlimited Website Audits, free forever | 150 test runs/mo, 60-day retention, 30 locations |
| Filmstrip / waterfall-level performance detail WebPageTest's signature depth - frame-by-frame render filmstrips across real global test locations | Timing metrics & filmstrip included | Deep multi-location filmstrip & waterfall analysis |
| Real user monitoring (RUM) & session replay | No | Expert tier only |
| Global test location breadth | Single test location per run | 30-40+ locations (paid), 300+ cities (Expert) |
| SEO checks | Yes | No |
| Accessibility/WCAG mapping | Yes | No |
| Security header, cookie & CORS analysis | Yes | No |
| Repository/code scanning | Yes | No |
Where WebPageTest is the better choice
For genuinely deep performance diagnostics - frame-by-frame filmstrips, detailed waterfalls, and testing from dozens to hundreds of real-world global locations - WebPageTest's specialized tooling goes further than any general-purpose audit tool, Scanverra included.
Where Scanverra is the better choice
WebPageTest has no SEO, accessibility, or security scope even on its most expensive tier. Scanverra runs a comparable Lighthouse-based performance pass and adds all of that in the same scan, with AI-written fixes for whatever it finds.
Frequently asked questions
Is WebPageTest's free tier better than Scanverra's for performance testing?
For pure depth of performance diagnostics - filmstrips, detailed waterfalls, 30 global test locations - WebPageTest's free Starter tier is a genuinely powerful, purpose-built tool. Scanverra's performance check is one part of a broader audit rather than a dedicated deep-dive performance tool.
Does WebPageTest check SEO or security like Scanverra does?
No - WebPageTest's scope, even on its Expert tier, is performance testing and monitoring (lab data, RUM, session replay). It has no SEO, accessibility, or security-header analysis, which is where Scanverra's Website Audit and Security Scanner cover ground WebPageTest doesn't.
Why is WebPageTest's Expert tier so much more expensive?
The Expert tier includes Catchpoint's full real-user monitoring and session replay infrastructure across 3,000+ global agents - a much larger operational footprint than lab-only performance testing, priced accordingly for enterprise monitoring use cases.
Can I test from multiple global locations with Scanverra?
Scanverra's audit runs from a single test location per scan, whereas WebPageTest's paid tiers test from dozens to hundreds of global locations. If multi-region performance variance is specifically what you need to measure, WebPageTest's breadth there is a genuine advantage.
Other comparisons
Scanverra vs. GTmetrix
A performance testing and monitoring tool built on Lighthouse, with historical charting and alerting on paid plans.
Scanverra vs. Pingdom
Uptime, synthetic transaction, and real-user performance monitoring with alerting and public status pages - a free trial, then volume-based subscription tiers.
Scanverra vs. Google PageSpeed Insights
Google's free Lighthouse-based performance report, with real-user CrUX field data alongside the lab score - no account, no pricing tiers.
See performance, SEO, accessibility & security in one scan
Not just a filmstrip - a full audit with AI-written fixes tailored to your stack.
Run free audit